Tech Transfer Central
Industry-Sponsored Research Management

Optimal Use of Provisional Patent Applications: Best Practices and Pitfalls to Avoid

Format: On-Demand Video, DVD, or PDF Transcript
Originally presented: December 10, 2015

Share:
Twitter Facebook Linkedin Pinterest Email
Price: $197
order optionsorder buttonorder buttonorder button view cart

In this first-to-file world, provisional patent applications are a critical part of every TTO’s overall patent strategy. They’re quick, easy, and can usually be prepared with minimal expense. They offer a crucial placeholder for technologies that you still need time to develop and assess, affording you more time to determine whether to commit your resources toward converting to a formal patent application.  

But, make one small mistake on the application and the results can be devastating. Poorly drafted provisionals can be useless or even worse, they can be used against you to prove your invention was not more than a vague concept at the time of filing. As a result, you don’t get the priority date, and your ability to later convert the provisional could be destroyed.   

DON’T LET IT HAPPEN TO YOU OR YOUR FACULTY INVENTORS! Register today for:

Optimal Use of Provisional Patent Applications: 
Best Practices and Pitfalls to Avoid 

Technology Transfer Tactics has recruited two patent experts: Dale S. Lazar and Timothy Lohse, both partners at DLA Piper LLP (US), to lead this 90-minute webinar regarding provisional patent applications, their benefits and limitations, and best practices for using the applications.

Join us as the panel reviews these key issues:

  • Under what circumstances will a patent claimant get the most out of a provisional patent application?
  • Benefits and limitations of provisionals
  • Identifying and preventing common and damaging mistakes with provisionals
  • Drawings in provisionals: yes, no, or maybe
  • Potential issues with “coversheet” provisionals
  • Meeting written description and disclosure requirements under 35 U.S.C. 112
  • Should you tie non-provisional patent applications to provisional applications?

Your program leaders

Timothy LohseTimothy Lohse, Partner, DLA Piper. Timothy concentrates in patent prosecution, patent litigation and patent counseling.  He also provides patent preparation and prosecution in software and related technologies as well as mechanical, electromechanical and electrical technologies. He is also experienced in patent re-examinations.

 

Dale S. LazarDale S. Lazar, Partner, DLA Piper. Dale concentrates his practice in patenting electronic technology, patenting and copyrighting computer hardware and software, litigating patents and copyrights, negotiating and drafting licenses for patents and software, and preparing software-related agreements. He has also been involved in analyzing electronic and computer-related patents and copyright for infringement and validity.

Our Guarantee of Quality and Value
We stand 100% behind the quality and value of our products. If you are dissatisfied, simply let us know and we will send you an immediate refund for your entire order -- no questions asked.

CLP and CLE Credits Available
Please review your State Bar’s policy on distance learning credits prior to submitting the non-refundable application fee. We submit CLE applications (excluding NY, NJ, IL, LA & PA) for an additional $50 (unless otherwise specified upon checkout). Approval times vary per state and cover all attorneys in attendance. Application is not a guarantee of approval and attendance forms must be submitted following the program.

CLP Credits are also available.


Ordering Options
Choose from a variety of options below -- all including the original program materials.

order buttonorder buttonorder button
view cart


Click here for a printable order form